Pulfrich also gave full credit to a techical assistant, F. Fertsh, for the findings that the "difference in brightness of the view in front of the two eyes elicited the (Pulfrich) effect." (Christianson & Hofsetter, 1972) Fertsh was also credited for his explanation of the phenomenon in terms of perceptual latency.
Pulfrich's son, Hans, a doctor of Philosophy, was also given due credit for coming up with the theoretical analysis of the "path of apparent movement based on an assumed perceptual latency" ( Christianson & Hofstetter, 1972). Pulfrich only credited himself for the notion of the pulfrich phenomenon could be used in heterochromatic photometry.
In 1922, Pulfrich demonstration apparatus did not include a pendulum as it is usually stated in description of the pulfrich effects. Instead, blocks of square apectures were used. Below are the designs of Pulfrich's earlier models.( Figure 1 and 2)
(Christianson & Hoffsetter,1973)
No comments:
Post a Comment